Kianfar payamani; Eisa Solgi; Kazem Rangzan; Taher Farhadinejad
Abstract
Sediments can be sensitive indicators for monitoring contaminants in aquatic environments. Therefore, understanding the mechanisms of accumulation and geochemical distribution of heavy metals in aquatic systems and providing basic information for judging environmental health risks, spatial study of metal ...
Read More
Sediments can be sensitive indicators for monitoring contaminants in aquatic environments. Therefore, understanding the mechanisms of accumulation and geochemical distribution of heavy metals in aquatic systems and providing basic information for judging environmental health risks, spatial study of metal concentrations in sediments and their comparison with non-contaminated bases is of great importance. One of the common methods of soil pollution assessment is the use of pollution factor index (CF). The calculation of this index requires determining the background of the elements under study. For this purpose, statistical methods based on mean and standard deviation of data are commonly used. Due to the skuwness of the distribution of geochemical data, the use of this parametric method is limited, so the use of methods resistant to outlier data can be proposed as an alternative approach. In the last two decades, the fractal method has been used to separate communities in data related to many disciplines of earth sciences. In order to evaluate the two mentioned methods, 770 samples of waterway sediments containing six metal elements of As, Cr, Cu, Ni, Pb and Zn were collected in an area that is located in the north of Khorramabad. The background of the elements was determined by both methods (statistical method resistant to outlier data and fractal method) and finally the CF index was calculated. This index based on statistical methods assessed at the intermediate level for arsenic, chromium, copper, nickel, lead and zinc 7.5, 0.8, 5.5, 0.5, 4.7 and 9.2 percent, respectively. For the mentioned elements based on fractal method, the medium level of contamination were 39%, 28.9%, 88.6%, 39.4%, 45.7%, 73.4% of the total sample, respectively. In addition, with the second method, 3% (copper), 0.1% (lead) and 4.3% (zinc) of the number of samples have been evaluated at a considerable level. The results showed that the use of statistical methods in determining the background of the elements, despite the selection of a statistical method appropriate to the distribution of data, has reduced the sensitivity of the pollution index and reduced the efficiency of the index in the separation of pollution classes. While the use of fractal method due to considering the spatial dimension (area) in separating different background communities from anomalies leads to better efficiency of CF index and thus improves regional pollution estimates.
